"I Wouldn't Like To Talk About It"
An interview with director of The Return
Alexander Zvyagintsev
given to correspondent of Kommersant
Alexei Karakhan.

Q: How do you explain the run-away success of The Return on the festival circuit?


A: It's hard for me to say why the film has been so popular with the selection committees of various film festivals but whatever the reason, one can't overestimate the importance of this phenomenon, only underestimate it. Such things happen, perhaps, only once in a lifetime. At the moment I live with a feeling of happiness which came out of the blue. When we were making the film, I hoped it was going to be selected by some big festival and sometimes I would say to my actors and the crew: let's work really hard because one day we are going to climb the steps in Cannes.

 

Q: Does it mean the festival success was pre-calculated?

A: No, it wasn't. Though we are often told that we have borrowed heavily from the aesthetics popular in the West, it's only a reflection of my own and the DOP's taste rather than an attempt to please festivals' selection committees. And I hope that those who select films understood it and saw not only the personal drama of a father-son relationship in my film, but also its deeper meanings.

Q: What meanings do you see in your film?

A: I vowed that I wasn't going to talk about what I myself see in my film. I want to leave the viewer one-to-one with the movie. I would like the viewers to decide for themselves what they don't like about the film, what they don't understand in it, why they like itÑwithout the director's commentary getting in the way.

Q: After the screening, many critics compared the feel of your film with that of Tarkovsky's work. What do you think about it?

A: For a Russian film director it is impossible not to feel Tarkovsky's overreaching influence, because he, perhaps, is the most profound individual in our cinema. So, I'm flattered that the critics noticed such similarities, perhaps, in the way time flows in my film. However, I did not try to imitate Tarkovsky or quote from him.

Q: There are many biblical motifs in The Return, though on the whole it wouldn't be right to say that the film is about religiosity. Why?

A: One shouldn't speak out loud about sacral and important meanings because as soon as we start blabbering about them, all that is magic and sacral immediately evaporates. One should not talk about but suggest what is of real importance. That's what I tried to do in my film.

Q: Do you think the return of the prodigal father to his family had any meaning and did it help your characters?

A: No meeting is meaningless in its essence. If it is not necessary, it is simply not going to happen. This is not just a personal story which allows for all sorts of things to happen by chance. Everything here has a meaning, everything is predetermined. Has this meeting done any good to anyone? If we see the meeting as something sacral then everyone needs it equally. We can draw a parallel with an Eastern tradition here: a meeting is as important for the teacher as it is for the student. However, to be honest with you, I wouldn't like to go on about it. You are asking questions which require either avoiding the answer or getting deeper into the film, and I've already explained I wouldn't like to do it.

Q: Then I'll ask you the most superficial question I can think of. What is in the box which is the goal of the father and son's journey?

A: It's a secret. In fact, it's of no importance really. It contains some mystery which disappears together with the mysterious father.